netdev - Re: [PATCHv4 net-next] xfrm: Namespacify xfrm_policy_sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52B91E21.1050907@windriver.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Dec 2013 13:39:45 +0800
From:	Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<eric.dumazet@...il.com>, <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	<steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net-next] xfrm: Namespacify xfrm_policy_sk_bundles



On 2013年12月24日 13:31, David Miller wrote:
> From: Fan Du<fan.du@...driver.com>
> Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 09:12:32 +0800
>
>> >  I saw this patch is marked 'Not Applicable' in patchwork.
> It means that it doesn't go in via my tree directly, it
> "doesn't apply".
>
> Instead, it goes into Steffen's IPSEC tree.
>

Thanks for your explanation!!!

I'm not well understand the curtsy about patchwork, and one last question,
[PATCHv4 net-next 0/8] pktgen IPsec support is tagged as 'Awaiting Upstream'
what does that mean and do I need to take further action about this patch set?


-- 
浮沉随浪只记今朝笑

--fan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html