[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52B9B90E.6040106@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:40:46 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@...thlink.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/20] ppp: slight optimization of addr compare
Hello.
On 24-12-2013 20:35, Joe Perches wrote:
> []
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c b/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
> []
>>> @@ -131,12 +131,13 @@ static inline struct pppoe_net *pppoe_pernet(struct net *net)
>>>
>>> static inline int cmp_2_addr(struct pppoe_addr *a, struct pppoe_addr *b)
>>> {
>>> - return a->sid == b->sid && !memcmp(a->remote, b->remote, ETH_ALEN);
>>> + return a->sid == b->sid && ether_addr_equal(a->remote,
>>> + b->remote);
>> If it really doesn't fit insto single line, the continuation line should
>> start right under 'a->remote'.
> Better still might be
>
> return a->sid == b->sid &&
> ether_addr_equal(a->remote, b->remote);
Actually, after the second look, I don't know why the line was broken at all.
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists