[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52C11062.9040906@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 14:19:14 +0800
From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: Ding Tianhong <dthxman@...il.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 11/20] net: packetengines: slight optimization
of addr
On 2013/12/30 14:05, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 10:39 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> I don't understand packetengine NIC anymore, But I think the change is clearly,
>> as your said, the broadcast check is enough here, did you mean that?
>>
>> !is_broadcast_ether_addr((u8 *)(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma) +
>> entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)))
>
> Not quite. I meant this could be:
>
> u8 *addr = (u8 *)(unsigned long)le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma) +
> entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc);
>
> if (!ether_addr_equal(addr, dev->dev_addr) &&
> !is_broadcast_ether_addr(addr)) {
> etc...
>
> but again, I think thus hardly matters and could just as well
> be left alone.
>
>
Ok, I will focus on ether_addr_equal in this patch, anymore will left alone. Thanks
Regards
Ding
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists