netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/11] use ether_addr_equal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1312302057420.2209@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date:	Mon, 30 Dec 2013 20:58:55 +0100 (CET)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
cc:	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
	Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@...ux.intel.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/11]  use ether_addr_equal_64bits

> Seems to be missing an "iwlwifi:" or so prefix, but I guess we can add
> it when we take the patch ...

Sorry.  Not sure why that happened.  I'll look into it.

> Is there any way we could catch (sparse, or some other script?) that
> struct reorganising won't break the condition needed ("within a
> structure that contains at least two more bytes")?

What kind of reorganizing could happen?  Do you mean that the programmer 
might do at some time in the future, or something the compiler might do?

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html