[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52C33F26.8070609@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 01:03:18 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Zhi Yong Wu <zwu.kernel@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: davem@...emloft.net, therbert@...gle.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next bugfix] net, rps: fix build failure when CONFIG_RPS
isn't set
Hello.
On 12/31/2013 11:31 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> From: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/net/sock.h | 4 ++++
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> index 8ee90ad..bd716b6 100644
> --- a/include/net/sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> @@ -846,12 +846,16 @@ static inline void sock_rps_reset_flow_hash(__u32 hash)
>
> static inline void sock_rps_record_flow(const struct sock *sk)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> sock_rps_record_flow_hash(sk->sk_rxhash);
> +#endif
> }
>
> static inline void sock_rps_reset_flow(const struct sock *sk)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> sock_rps_reset_flow_hash(sk->sk_rxhash);
> +#endif
> }
A lot better style would be:
+#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
static inline void sock_rps_reset_flow(const struct sock *sk)
{
sock_rps_reset_flow_hash(sk->sk_rxhash);
}
#else
static inline void sock_rps_reset_flow(const struct sock *sk) {}
+#endif
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists