[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131231.160851.1101721532410450212.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 16:08:51 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com
Cc: zwu.kernel@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, therbert@...gle.com,
fengguang.wu@...el.com, wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [net-next bugfix] net, rps: fix build failure when CONFIG_RPS
isn't set
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 01:03:18 +0300
> Hello.
>
> On 12/31/2013 11:31 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>
>> From: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>> Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/sock.h | 4 ++++
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
>> index 8ee90ad..bd716b6 100644
>> --- a/include/net/sock.h
>> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
>> @@ -846,12 +846,16 @@ static inline void
>> sock_rps_reset_flow_hash(__u32 hash)
>>
>> static inline void sock_rps_record_flow(const struct sock *sk)
>> {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
>> sock_rps_record_flow_hash(sk->sk_rxhash);
>> +#endif
>> }
>>
>> static inline void sock_rps_reset_flow(const struct sock *sk)
>> {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
>> sock_rps_reset_flow_hash(sk->sk_rxhash);
>> +#endif
>> }
>
> A lot better style would be:
Sorry, I meant to say, this is consistent with how the other functions
dependent upon RPS are handled.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists