[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140102.123921.1427916612449970973.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:39:21 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc: sd@...asysnail.net, johannes@...solutions.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] alx: add alx_get_stats operation
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:56:53 +0000
> On Wed, 2014-01-01 at 22:27 -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
>> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 00:40:27 +0100
>>
>> > + spin_lock(&alx->stats_lock);
>> > +
>> > + __alx_update_hw_stats(&alx->hw);
>>
>> Please use something like the linux/u64_stats_sync.h stuff rather
>> than spin locking.
>
> I don't think that'sa useful, as we can have multiple writers
> (concurrent calls to get_stats). And there is really no harm in using a
> spinlock to serialise get_stats calls. The u64_stats API is good for
> statistics updated from the data path.
Fair enough.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists