[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140102.172334.1775225132082706633.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 17:23:34 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: vyasevich@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...driver.com, jhs@...atatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: Remove outqueue empty state
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 14:39:44 -0500
> The SCTP outqueue structure maintains a data chunks
> that are pending transmission, the list of chunks that
> are pending a retransmission and a length of data in
> flight. It also tries to keep the emtpy state so that
> it can performe shutdown sequence or notify user.
>
> The problem is that the empy state is inconsistently
> tracked. It is possible to completely drain the queue
> without sending anything when using PR-SCTP. In this
> case, the empty state will not be correctly state as
> report by Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>. This
> can cause an association to be perminantly stuck in the
> SHUTDOWN_PENDING state.
>
> Additionally, SCTP is incredibly inefficient when setting
> the empty state. Even though all the data is availaible
> in the outqueue structure, we ignore it and walk a list
> of trasnports.
>
> In the end, we can completely remove the extra empty
> state and figure out if the queue is empty by looking
> at 3 things: length of pending data, length of in-flight
> data, and exisiting of retransmit data. All of these
> are already in the strucutre.
>
> Reported-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Applied, but:
> + */
^^
Trailing whitespace which I had to fixup when applying this.
THanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists