[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140102074257.GA1637@dhcp-0-146.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 08:42:57 +0100
From: Petr Pisar <ppisar@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not listen if rtnl_send() fails in ip link
iplink_have_newlink() test
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 08:21:07AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> I took your idea and enhanced it to all of iproute2 by doing the following:
>
> From c4b6330a3a033bd9c9b0664c5f844493137ae599 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 08:15:02 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] check return value of rtnl_send and related functions
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> Use warn_unused_result to enforce checking return value of rtnl_send,
> and fix where the errors are.
>
[...]
> diff --git a/ip/iplink.c b/ip/iplink.c
> index 58b6c20..e0c14e6 100644
> --- a/ip/iplink.c
> +++ b/ip/iplink.c
> @@ -178,7 +178,10 @@ static int iplink_have_newlink(void)
> req.n.nlmsg_type = RTM_NEWLINK;
> req.i.ifi_family = AF_UNSPEC;
>
> - rtnl_send(&rth, &req.n, req.n.nlmsg_len);
> + if (rtnl_send(&rth, &req.n, req.n.nlmsg_len) < 0) {
> + perror("request send failed");
> + exit(1);
> + }
> rtnl_listen(&rth, accept_msg, NULL);
> }
> return have_rtnl_newlink;
This one exits instead of falling back to IOCTL. iplink_have_newlink() is
called even from iplink_usage(). This even prevents from printing usage.
I think failure in this very place should be treated as I suggested.
-- Petr
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists