netdev - Re: [PATCH net] bridge: Fix crash with vlan filtering and tcpdump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52C6FC2D.1000800@cogentembedded.com>
Date:	Fri, 03 Jan 2014 21:06:37 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: Fix crash with vlan filtering and tcpdump

Hello.

On 01/03/2014 07:12 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:

> When the vlan filtering is enabled on the bridge, but
> the filter is not configured on the bridge device itself,
> running tcpdump on the bridge device will result in a
> an Ooops with NULL pointer dereference.  The reason
> is that br_pass_frame_up() will bypass the vlan
> check because promisc flag is set.  It will then try
> to get the table pointer and process the packet based
> on the table.  Since the table pointer is NULL, we oops.
> Catch this special condition in br_handle_vlan().

> Reported-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
> CC: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
[...]

> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> index af5ebd1..ea0c29b 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> @@ -144,6 +144,18 @@ struct sk_buff *br_handle_vlan(struct net_bridge *br,
>   	if (!br->vlan_enabled)
>   		goto out;
>
> +	/* Vlan filter table must be configrured at this point.  The

    Only "configured".

> +	 * only exception is the bridge is set in promisc mode and the
> +	 * packet is destined for the bridge device.  In this case
> +	 * pass the packet as is.
> +	 */
> +	if (!pv) {
> +       		if ((br->dev->flags & IFF_PROMISC) && skb->dev == br->dev)

    You've indented this *if* too much.

> +			goto out;
> +		else
> +			BUG();
> +	}
> +

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html