[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140103164723.6c514c2b@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 16:47:23 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: unify the pcpu_tstats and br_cpu_netstats
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 16:43:37 -0800
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 4:32 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> > From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> > Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 04:53:47 +0000 (UTC)
> >
> >> On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 at 08:57 GMT, roy.qing.li@...il.com <roy.qing.li@...il.com> wrote:
> >>> From: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@...il.com>
> >>>
> >>> They are same, so unify them as one, pcpu_tstats.
> >>> and move pcpu_tstat into netdevice.h
> >>>
> >>
> >> tstats means Tunnel STATS, right? So, it has to be
> >> in if_tunnel.h.
> >
> > They are being used in the bridging code now, did you read the
> > patch?
> >
> > So not really limited to just tunnels, and therefore they really do
> > belong somewhere generic like netdevice.h
>
> I knew, my point is we should find a better name than "tstat".
>
> >
> > This also means that since they are now an encapsulation thing we
> > should rename them to pcpu_encap_stats or similar, thanks.
>
> Not sure "encap" makes sense for bridge too.
They are just the "busy" statistics from netdevice.
How about pcpu_sw_netstat?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists