[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140106.151152.229689152907259833.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 15:11:52 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hannes@...essinduktion.org
Cc: fx.lebail@...oo.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] IPv6: use anycast addresses as source
addresses in echo reply
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 00:05:05 +0100
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 05:43:31PM +0100, Francois-Xavier Le Bail wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/icmp.c b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
>> index 5d42009..65c8619 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv6/icmp.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
>> @@ -556,7 +556,9 @@ static void icmpv6_echo_reply(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>
>> saddr = &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr;
>>
>> - if (!ipv6_unicast_destination(skb))
>> + if (!ipv6_unicast_destination(skb) &&
>> + !(net->ipv6.anycast_src_echo_reply &&
>> + ipv6_chk_acast_addr(net, NULL, saddr)))
>> saddr = NULL;
>
> I am not sure why you left out the device at ipv6_chk_acast_addr?
>
> IMHO this logic is a bit more complex, we can pass NULL for ipv6 addresses of
> scope global but need to check the interface for scope link.
>
> It is already possible via setsockopt JOIN_ANYCAST that an ll address is
> anycast on another interface which may not be checked here.
I think we should pass a valid device in unless it breaks something
obvious.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists