netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next V2 3/3] net: Add GRO support for vxlan traffic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 07 Jan 2014 08:34:21 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Cc:	hkchu@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, yanb@...lanox.com,
	shlomop@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 3/3] net: Add GRO support for vxlan traffic

On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 17:29 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Add gro handlers for vxlan using the udp gro infrastructure
> 


>  static void vxlan_notify_add_rx_port(struct sock *sk)
>  {
> @@ -568,6 +661,8 @@ static void vxlan_notify_add_rx_port(struct sock *sk)
>  			dev->netdev_ops->ndo_add_vxlan_port(dev, sa_family,
>  							    port);
>  	}
> +	if (sa_family == AF_INET)
> +		udp_add_offload(&vxlan_offload, port);
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>  }
>  

This means two vxlan tunnels can not share same port.

Is that a valid assertion ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html