[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZOPZ+8bNi+HZ=eyGBwzFDdrkroMVyPzoGERFqcnZPq3rBZ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 21:43:55 +0200
From: Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>, Jerry Chu <hkchu@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Yan Burman <yanb@...lanox.com>,
Shlomo Pongratz <shlomop@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 3/3] net: Add GRO support for vxlan traffic
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 17:29 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> Add gro handlers for vxlan using the udp gro infrastructure
>>
>
>
>> static void vxlan_notify_add_rx_port(struct sock *sk)
>> {
>> @@ -568,6 +661,8 @@ static void vxlan_notify_add_rx_port(struct sock *sk)
>> dev->netdev_ops->ndo_add_vxlan_port(dev, sa_family,
>> port);
>> }
>> + if (sa_family == AF_INET)
>> + udp_add_offload(&vxlan_offload, port);
>> rcu_read_unlock();
>> }
>>
>
> This means two vxlan tunnels can not share same port.
> Is that a valid assertion ?
nope -- the vxlan driver opens a listener udp socket per per listening
port, but N > 1 vxlan tunnels can sit on that port, the driver does
further demuxing based on the vnid carried in the vxlan header, see
the call to vxlan_find_vni() from vxlan_rcv()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists