[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140107230134.GK30393@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 00:01:34 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>
Cc: Francois-Xavier Le Bail <fx.lebail@...oo.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki Yoshifuji <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] IPv6: add the option to use anycast addresses as source addresses in echo reply
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 05:55:07PM -0500, Bill Fink wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2014, Francois-Xavier Le Bail wrote:
>
> > This change allows to follow a recommandation of RFC4942.
> >
> > - Add "anycast_src_echo_reply" sysctl to control the use of anycast addresses
> > as source addresses for ICMPv6 echo reply. This sysctl is false by default
> > to preserve existing behavior.
> > - Add inline check ipv6_anycast_destination().
> > - Use them in icmpv6_echo_reply().
> >
> > Reference:
> > RFC4942 - IPv6 Transition/Coexistence Security Considerations
> > (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4942#section-2.1.6)
> >
> > 2.1.6. Anycast Traffic Identification and Security
> >
> > [...]
> > To avoid exposing knowledge about the internal structure of the
> > network, it is recommended that anycast servers now take advantage of
> > the ability to return responses with the anycast address as the
> > source address if possible.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Francois-Xavier Le Bail <fx.lebail@...oo.com>
> > ---
> > v4: update Subject and Documentation, this work also with anycast addresses
> > created via API, not just with Subnet-Router anycast addresses.
> >
> > v5: alternative way, replace ipv6_chk_acast_addr() test by
> > ipv6_anycast_destination() test.
>
> Why is ICMPV6 Echo Reply special? Can't the internal structure
> of the network be divined from other ICMPv6 responses such as
> Destination Unreachable, Time Exceeded (Hop Limit), and Parameter
> Problem.
No, here destination must match the source address so that the other side
handles accordingly when the icmp error is pushed up to the socket layer.
Greetings,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists