[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52CB7736.701@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 11:40:38 +0800
From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
CC: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3.5 10/19] mac8011: slight optimization of addr compare
On 2014/1/6 23:11, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 19:40 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> Use the possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal
>> to instead of memcmp.
>
> This is a slow-path, I don't think that's really worth it. It kinda
> makes sense, but relies on the struct mac_address allocation for
> alignment and the fact that there are no other members in that struct,
> so it seems to me that this ought to also add some alignment attributes?
>
> johannes
>
>
Yes, I had to say that it is really a slight optimization.And I am sure the address in the struct
is alignment, otherwise I have to use the ether_addr_equal_unaligned().
Regards
Ding
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists