[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140106205932.29553fd2@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 20:59:32 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: christophe.gouault@...nd.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
amwang@...hat.com, saurabh@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vti: get rid of nf mark rule in prerouting
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:53:04 -0400 (EDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Christophe Gouault <christophe.gouault@...nd.com>
> Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 17:21:22 +0200
>
> > This patch fixes and improves the use of vti interfaces (while
> > lightly changing the way of configuring them).
> ...
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe Gouault <christophe.gouault@...nd.com>
> > ---
> > This is is both a fix and enhancement patch. However, there are 2 ways
> > of fixing the inbound processing bug:
> > - either keep the current configuration model (ikey + netfilter rule)
> > and change the tunnel lookup method. This patch would then be reverted
> > by the enhancement (this sounds counterproductive).
> > - or directly change the configuration model (okey, no netfilter rule) and keep
> > the current tunnel lookup method.
>
> Ok, applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.
I hate to reply to old threads, but this keeps context.
We have discovered a problem with this patch, it breaks the earlier use of VTI
because it loses the mark applied through iptables. It was not a "light change"
to the way to configure them and should have gotten more review and was not
appropriate for -stable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists