netdev - [PATCH net-next 0/2] Pack struct xfrm_usersa_info and struct xfrm_userpolicy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1389077339-12814-1-git-send-email-fan.du@windriver.com>
Date:	Tue, 7 Jan 2014 14:48:57 +0800
From:	Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
To:	<steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
CC:	<davem@...emloft.net>, <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	<dev@...ts.strongswan.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Pack struct xfrm_usersa_info and struct xfrm_userpolicy_info

When trying to setup IPsec configuration on a 64bits host with
iproute2(32bits compiled), the intened xfrm policy and sa is
either deficit or wrong when kernel trying to parse user land
information.

Further investigatino shows that:
L: kernel
R: iproute2

          sizeof       userpolicy      usersa
64bits(unpacked)        168/168        224/224
32bits(unpacked)        164/164        220/220
                         ^   ^
                         L   R

To keep kernel and user land see a consistent structure, after
add packing attribute, now it looks like this:

64bits(  packed)        164/164        217/217
32bits(  packed)        164/164        217/217
                         ^   ^
                         L   R

Then different kernel/iproute2 build configuration will not impact IPsec setup.

Fan Du (2):
  include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h: Pack struct xfrm_userpolicy_info
  include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h: Pack struct xfrm_usersa_info

 include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html