netdev - Re: single process receives own frames due to PACKET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52CD6280.3080300@aimvalley.nl>
Date:	Wed, 08 Jan 2014 15:36:48 +0100
From:	Norbert van Bolhuis <nvbolhuis@...valley.nl>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
CC:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, uaca@...mni.uv.es
Subject: Re: single process receives own frames due to PACKET_MMAP

On 01/08/14 15:24, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 01/08/2014 03:18 PM, Norbert van Bolhuis wrote:
>
>>>> Is there a way to use one PF_PACKET socket for both TX and RX and use PACKET_MMAP ?
>>>
>>> Yep:
>>>
>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/269129/focus=269188
>>>
>>> Feel free to make a patch and add this to Documentation/networking/packet_mmap.txt
>>> I think could be useful for others as well.
>>
>>
>> Good, it all works fine now, though performance is still not as good as I'd hoped.
>
> Does your use case allow for TPACKET_V3 or for using fanout ?
>

no, unfortunately not.

Though currently our performance is limited by application/system stuff, so
at the moment it doesn't really matter.

--
Norbert


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html