[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140109091735.00002cf0@unknown>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 09:17:35 -0800
From: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
CC: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <gospo@...hat.com>,
<sassmann@...hat.com>,
"Mitch Williams" <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 05/15] i40e: add a comment on barrier and fix panic
on reset
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 18:42:00 +0400
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 09-01-2014 16:52, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
>
> > From: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
>
> > The memory barrier used in maybe_stop_tx can use a comment.
>
> > Also add checks to VSI->rx_rings to ensure a kernel panic is not
> > induced.
>
> Don't see why this is made in one patch instead of two since the
> two things look completely unrelated and even modifying different
> files.
>
> > Change-ID: I48cc1bf1d6cf301818155b737edeef77c0d790c7
> > Change-ID: I1363a8445fbf521a26267849966296ed55f43ad8
>
> Why even 2 of them?
>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
> > Tested-by: Kavindya Deegala <kavindya.s.deegala@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
Yes, it's apparent that two different internal patches were compressed
together. If its unacceptable to do this then I'll speak to Jeff about
splitting them.
- Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists