[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2C8FA848-3185-43BA-BDD7-955B0C7DD835@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 17:34:18 +0000
From: "Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
To: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com>
CC: "Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>,
"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 3/7] ixgbe: Use static inlines instead of macros
On Jan 8, 2014, at 12:47 AM, Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 7, 2014, at 11:40 PM, Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
>>
>> -#define IXGBE_WRITE_REG(a, reg, value) writel((value), ((a)->hw_addr + (reg)))
>> +static inline void IXGBE_WRITE_REG(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, u32 reg, u32 value)
>
> Bummer, now you have a all-caps func name.
Agreed, but this is actually a fairly common condition among drivers that used to use macros. It isn't perfect, but at least it is moving in the right direction. I'd rather leave the case change for a later patch series that does only that or has some reason to touch all of the register access sites.
At least the new accessor I introduced is lower case. :-)
--
Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (842 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists