[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52CE6052.5030905@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:39:46 +0800
From: Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
CC: <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<stephen@...workplumber.org>, <dev@...ts.strongswan.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h: Pack struct xfrm_userpolicy_info
On 2014年01月08日 06:52, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 07-01-2014 10:48, Fan Du wrote:
>
>> Otherwise 64bits kernel has sizeof(struct xfrm_userpolicy_info) 168 bytes,
>> while 32bits compiled iproute2 see the same structure as 164 bytes, which
>> leading deficit xfrm policy, in turn broken IPsec connectivity.
>
>> Fix this by packing the structure.
>
> This will force byte-by-byte access to all members on some arches like ARM...
>
>> Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
>> ---
>> include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h b/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
>> index a8cd6a4..470bfae 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
>> @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ struct xfrm_userpolicy_info {
>> /* Automatically expand selector to include matching ICMP payloads. */
>> #define XFRM_POLICY_ICMP 2
>> __u8 share;
>> -};
>> +} __attribute__((packed));
>
> Please use the __packed macro instead. I guess you haven't run checkpatch.pl?
Lucky me, I run checkpatch every time before sending patch out.
--
浮沉随浪只记今朝笑
--fan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists