netdev - linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140109134117.41611cbfb87052212da67f03@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jan 2014 13:41:17 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	Weilong Chen <chenweilong@...wei.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with the net-next
 tree

Hi Steffen,

Today's linux-next merge of the ipsec-next tree got a conflict in
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c between commits be7928d20bab ("net: xfrm:
xfrm_policy: fix inline not at beginning of declaration") and
da7c224b1baa ("net: xfrm: xfrm_policy: silence compiler warning") from
the net-next tree and commit 2f3ea9a95c58 ("xfrm: checkpatch erros with
inline keyword position") from the ipsec-next tree.

I fixed it up (I used the version from the net-next tree) and can carry
the fix as necessary (no action is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped