[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140110111143.GB4132@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:11:43 +0100
From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
To: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] bonding: update the primary when slave name
changed
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 07:05:34PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>On 2014/1/10 15:44, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
>> If it's not the primray
>> slave, and we don't have one - select it as a new primary and, again, see
>> if we need to select a new active slave.
>
>I don't think so , I think if it is not the primary slave and we don't have one,
>no need to do anything, just a normal slave change its name.
If primary == "my_eth0", you have 2 slaves - "eth0" and "eth1", thus null
primary_slave, and rename eth0 to my_eth0 - then you need to set
primary_slave to my_eth0.
If primary == "my_eth0", you have 2 slaves - "my_eth0" and "eth1", thus
primary_slave == dev with name "my_eth0", and rename "my_eth0" to "eth0" -
then you must set primary_slave to NULL.
And after either of these you must see if you need to re-select the active
slave, as it might have been forced by the primary_slave, which has been
modified.
You might also want to add some pr_info() about adding/removing
primary_slave, as the user to be aware.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists