netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] packet: doc: describe PACKET_MMAP with one packet socket for rx and tx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140110.175811.1139439658496998152.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:58:11 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dborkman@...hat.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, nvbolhuis@...valley.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] packet: doc: describe PACKET_MMAP with one
 packet socket for rx and tx

From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:22:37 +0100

> From: Norbert van Bolhuis <nvbolhuis@...valley.nl>
> 
> Document how to use one AF_PACKET mmap socket for RX and TX.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Norbert van Bolhuis <nvbolhuis@...valley.nl>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>

Don't you need to evaluate need_rehook with at least the socket
lock held?

Otherwise how would two parallel bind() calls pan out?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html