netdev - Re: [RFC Patch net-next 4/4] net_sched: make ingress qdisc lockless

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWTVeoB+gEuZ+K=e_Buk5Fcj6e=rUsbD=SF4pzu=JLiEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jan 2014 17:21:54 -0800
From:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next 4/4] net_sched: make ingress qdisc lockless

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Well, there is one qdisc, and if your NIC is multiqueue, with for
> example 32 queues, you can have 32 cpu happily using this qdisc at once.

I did see this, but still don't see the problem.

>
> Thats why you need the spinlock.
>

It looks like you are saying we queue the packets somewhere
in qdisc_enqueue_root() therefore needs a spinlock, but looking
at the code:

static inline int qdisc_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch)
{
        qdisc_calculate_pkt_len(skb, sch);
        return sch->enqueue(skb, sch);
}

static inline int qdisc_enqueue_root(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch)
{
        qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->pkt_len = skb->len;
        return qdisc_enqueue(skb, sch) & NET_XMIT_MASK;
}

so it almost equals to calling ->enqueue directly, for ingress, which is
ingress_enqueue(). Except updating some stats, the only thing
it does is calling tc_classify().

So where is the problem at qdisc layer? I must miss something too obvious...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html