[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140112170939.GA17202@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 19:09:39 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Michael Dalton <mwdalton@...gle.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
lf-virt <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] virtio-net: initial debugfs support,
export mergeable rx buffer size
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 09:19:37PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote:
> Hi Jason, Michael
>
> Sorry for the delay in response. Jason, I agree this patch ended up
> being larger than expected. The major implementation parts are:
> (1) Setup directory structure (driver/per-netdev/rx-queue directories)
> (2) Network device renames (optional, so debugfs dir has the right name)
> (3) Support resizing the # of RX queues (optional - we could just export
> max_queue_pairs files and not delete files if an RX queue is disabled)
> (4) Reference counting - used in case someone opens a debugfs
> file and then removes the virtio-net device.
> (5) The actual mergeable rx buffer file implementation itself. For now
> I have added a seqcount for memory safety, but if a read-only race
> condition is acceptable we could elide the seqcount. FWIW, the
> seqcount write in receive_mergeable() should, on modern x86,
> translate to two non-atomic adds and two compiler barriers, so
> overhead is not expected to be meaningful.
>
> We can move to sysfs and this would simplify or eliminate much of the
> above, including most of (1) - (4). I believe our choices for what to
> do for the next patchset include:
> (a) Use debugfs as is currently done, removing any optional features
> listed above that are deemed unnecessary.
>
> (b) Add a per-netdev sysfs attribute group to net_device->sysfs_groups.
> Each attribute would display the mergeable packet buffer size for a given
> RX queue, and there would be max_queue_pairs attributes in total. This
> is already supported by net/core/net-sysfs.c:netdev_register_kobject(),
> but means that we would have a static set of per-RX queue files for
> all RX queues supported by the netdev, rather than dynamically displaying
> only the files corresponding to enabled RX queues (e.g., when # of RX
> queues is changed by ethtool -L <device>). For an example of this
> approach, see drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c.
>
> (c) Modify struct netdev_rx_queue to add virtio-net EWMA fields directly,
> and modify net-sysfs.c to manage the new fields. Unlike (b), this approach
> supports the RX queue resizing in (3) but means putting virtio-net info
> in netdev_rx_queue, which currently has only device-independent fields.
Can't we add struct attribute * to netdevice, and pass that in when
creating the kobj?
> My preference would be (b): try using sysfs and adding a device-specific
> attribute group to the virtio-net netdevice (stored in the existing
> 'sysfs_groups' field and supported by net-sysfs). This would avoid
> adding virtio-net specific information to net-sysfs. What would you
> prefer (or is there a better way than the approaches above)? Thanks!
>
> Best,
>
> Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists