[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHA+R7NnaxXgOGW=jTEGkeMByO7wXVr9bGR-J9rLzwL4ne52bA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:51:48 -0800
From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] packet: use percpu mmap tx frame pending refcount
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com> wrote:
> +static void packet_inc_pending(struct packet_ring_buffer *rb)
> +{
> + this_cpu_inc(*rb->pending_refcnt);
> +}
> +
> +static void packet_dec_pending(struct packet_ring_buffer *rb)
> +{
> + this_cpu_dec(*rb->pending_refcnt);
> +}
> +
> +static int packet_read_pending(const struct packet_ring_buffer *rb)
> +{
> + int i, refcnt = 0;
> +
> + /* We don't use pending refcount in rx_ring. */
> + if (rb->pending_refcnt == NULL)
> + return 0;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> + refcnt += *per_cpu_ptr(rb->pending_refcnt, i);
> +
> + return refcnt;
> +}
How is this supposed to work? Since there is no lock,
you can't read accurate refcnt. Take a look at lib/percpu_counter.c.
I guess for some reason you don't care the accuracy?
Then at least you need to comment in the code.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists