lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D4590AF@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jan 2014 13:26:17 +0000
From:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:	'Bjørn Mork' <bjorn@...k.no>
CC:	Thomas Kear <thomas@...r.co.nz>,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: PROBLEM: usbnet / ax88179_178a: Panic in usb_hcd_map_urb_for_dma

From: Bjørn Mork [mailto:bjorn@...k.no]
> David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> writes:
> > From: Bjørn Mork
> >> David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> writes:
> >>
> >> > The patch you submitted is wrong.
> >> > Whoever wrote the sg interface was on crack.
> >> > The 'last' marker needs moving as well.
> >>
> >> I'm afraid I don't understand what you meant by this.
> >>
> >> sg_init_table() set the 'last' marker.  AFAICS, you don't need to change
> >> it unless you want to chain lists.
> >>
> >> Care to explain with some code?
> >
> > Just assuming that there will be some code, somewhere, that will try
> > to process the entire sg list - so won't like the entry with a
> > NULL pointer and zero length at the end.
> >
> > If all the places that process the list are given an explicit
> > number of entries, or don't care about the NULL it doesn't matter.
> 
> I believe all processing use the urb->num_sgs field to limit the number
> of entries.  Common interfaces like dma_map_sg() and for_each_sg() limit
> their processing to "nents" entries, and the USB code use the value of
> urb->num_sgs for this parameter.

Which mostly means that the sg_xxx functions are doing a whole load
of unnecessary instructions and memory accesses...

This probably has a lot to do with the significant difference in the
cpu use for the usb3 and 'normal' ethernet interfaces.

While each bit doesn't seem significant, they soon add up.

	David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ