[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140114100900.GI31491@secunet.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:09:00 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 2/5] {IPv4,xfrm} Add ESN support for AH
ingress part
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:01:32PM +0800, Fan Du wrote:
>
>
> On 2014年01月14日 17:54, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:39:09AM +0800, Fan Du wrote:
> >>@@ -381,7 +393,14 @@ static int ah_input(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >> sg_init_table(sg, nfrags);
> >> skb_to_sgvec(skb, sg, 0, skb->len);
> >>
> >>- ahash_request_set_crypt(req, sg, icv, skb->len);
> >>+ if (x->props.flags& XFRM_STATE_ESN) {
> >>+ sg_unmark_end(&sg[nfrags - 1]);
> >>+ /* Attach seqhi sg right after packet payload */
> >>+ *seqhi = htonl(XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.output.hi);
> >
> >This is ah_input(), so you should use the high bits of the input
> >sequence number here. The ipv6 patch has the same problem.
>
> ok, I will fix this.
>
> >
> >>+ sg_init_table(seqhisg, sglists);
> >
> >Why do you add a separate SG table for this?
>
> It just initialize a single seqhisg, which is actually followed behind packet payload sg table.
> initialized seqhisg actually mark itself as the end of sg list.
>
Why don't you just add this entry to the existing SG table?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists