[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140114105537.GD20066@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:55:37 +0100
From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
To: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2.1 0/3] bonding: fix primary problem for
bonding
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 06:54:05PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>If the slave's name changed, and the bond params primary is exist,
>the bond should deal with the situation in two ways:
>
>1) If the slave was the primary slave yet, clean the primary slave
> and reselect active slave.
>2) If the slave's new name is as same as bond primary, set the slave
> as primary slave and reselect active slave.
>
>If the new primary is not matching any slave in the bond, the bond should
>record it to params, clean the primary slave and select a new active slave.
>
>Update bonding.txt for primary description.
>
>v2.1 Because there are too many indentions and useless verification, so rewrite
> the logic for updating the primary slave.
> Modify some comments for to clean the typos.
LOL. That's exactly what I was talking about in my previous email. A quick
fix that doesn't even address the issues.
Nacked-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
>
>Ding Tianhong (3):
> bonding: update the primary slave when changing slave's name
> bonding: clean the primary slave if there is no slave matching new
> primary
> bonding: update bonding.txt for primary description.
>
> Documentation/networking/bonding.txt | 3 ++-
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>--
>1.8.0
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists