netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] mvneta driver performance improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140115.000540.2059947089292889482.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:05:40 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	w@....eu
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] mvneta driver performance improvements

From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:48:31 +0100

> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 05:00:26PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
>> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:24:02 +0100
>> 
>> > this patch series implements several performance improvements on the
>> > mvneta driver.
>> 
>> Ignore that last email, I meant to say that this series did not apply
>> cleanly to net-next, sorry for the confusion.
> 
> David, this is because the first series is not applied first. I can
> understand it was not very clear (just mentionned in the e-mail's body).
> Do you prefer me to send you the two series for net-next or is it better
> to wait for the first series to be merged first before applying the
> second one ?
> 
> Just tell me what you prefer and I'll adapt.

Hmmm, didn't I apply the first series?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html