[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140115084605.GF29177@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:46:05 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable-only] virtio-net: fix build on m68k and sparc64
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 09:36:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> > As a result of backporting a bugfix, virtio_net started passing void *
> > to page_address, assuming that it will get silently converted to struct
> > page *. But this does not happen on architectures where page_address is
> > a macro, the result is build failure as the macro tries to dereference
> > void*.
> >
> > Fix by reordering code slightly, so we always pass
> > struct page * to page_address.
>
> Thanks for the clue! I was just investigating a similar failure in -next.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
You don't mean linux-next? And not in virtio-net? I don't see page_address
being used on void * anywhere there.
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists