netdev - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next] xen-netfront: clean up code in xennet_release_rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52D69837.9090609@oracle.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jan 2014 22:16:23 +0800
From:	annie li <annie.li@...cle.com>
To:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
CC:	xen-devel@...ts.xen.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	wei.liu2@...rix.com, ian.campbell@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next] xen-netfront: clean up code in xennet_release_rx_bufs


On 2014-1-15 19:20, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 09/01/14 22:48, Annie Li wrote:
>> Current netfront only grants pages for grant copy, not for grant transfer, so
>> remove corresponding transfer code and add receiving copy code in
>> xennet_release_rx_bufs.
> While netfront only supports a copying backend, I don't see anything
> preventing the backend from retaining mappings to netfront's Rx buffers...

Right. This does not prevent backend from mappings.
Maybe my description is not clear. What I mean here is based on old 
2.6.18 netfront which uses "copying_receiver" to tell netback whether rx 
requires grant copy. Probably changing "grant copy" above into "grant 
access" vs "grant transfer" is more precise. And the 
"gnttab_end_foreign_transfer_ref" is the unnecessary code kept from old 
netfront.

>
>> Signed-off-by: Annie Li <Annie.li@...cle.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/xen-netfront.c |   60 ++-----------------------------------------
>>   1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
>> index e59acb1..692589e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
>> @@ -1134,78 +1134,24 @@ static void xennet_release_tx_bufs(struct netfront_info *np)
>>   
>>   static void xennet_release_rx_bufs(struct netfront_info *np)
>>   {
> [...]
>> -		mfn = gnttab_end_foreign_transfer_ref(ref);
>> +		gnttab_end_foreign_access_ref(ref, 0);
> ... the gnttab_end_foreign_access_ref() may then fail and...
>
>>   		gnttab_release_grant_reference(&np->gref_rx_head, ref);
>>   		np->grant_rx_ref[id] = GRANT_INVALID_REF;
> [...]
>> +		kfree_skb(skb);
> ... this could then potentially free pages that the backend still has
> mapped.  If the pages are then reused, this would leak information to
> the backend.

Yes, it is possible. But doing kfree_skb is right thing from netfront 
point of view.

>
> Since only a buggy backend would result in this, leaking the skbs and
> grant refs would be acceptable here.

This is the same thing for tx side which uses similar process.

>    I would also print an error.

You mean add some print log here? Is it necessary?

Thanks
Annie
>
> While checking blkfront for how it handles this, it also doesn't appear
> to do the right thing either.
>
> David
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html