[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <52D6BF630200007800113EFB@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:03:31 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Andrew Cooper" <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>,
"Paul Durrant" <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>
Cc: "David Vrabel" <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next] xen-netfront: add support for
IPv6 offloads
>>> On 15.01.14 at 16:54, Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com> wrote:
>> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.cooper3@...rix.com]
>> On 15/01/14 15:18, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> > + err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "feature-gso-tcpv6", "%d", 1);
>>
>> "%d", 1 results in a constant string. xenbus_write() would avoid a
>> transitory memory allocation.
>
> This code is consistent with all the other xenbus_printf()s in the
> neighbourhood and does it really matter?
I think we should always strive to have the simplest possible code
that fulfills the purpose. And hence we shouldn't be setting further
bad precedents. (In fact I have a patch queued to replace all the
unnecessary xenbus_printf()s with xenbus_write()s on
linux-2.6.18-xen.hg, and may look into porting this to the
respective upstream components.)
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists