[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52D80D89.1040706@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:49:13 +0100
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: can: Disable flexcan driver build for big endian
CPU on ARM
On 01/14/2014 11:44 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On 01/06/2014 02:21 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> Building arm:allmodconfig fails with
>>>
>>> flexcan.c: In function 'flexcan_read':
>>> flexcan.c:243:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'in_be32'
>>> flexcan.c: In function 'flexcan_write':
>>> flexcan.c:248:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'out_be32'
>>>
>>> in_be32 and out_be32 do not (or no longer) exist for ARM targets.
>>> Disable the build for ARM on big endian CPUs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Applied to can-next.
>
> Sorry, this patch was wrong.
>
> There is no reason to disallow building the driver on big-endian
> ARM kernels. Furthermore, the current behavior is actually broken
> on little-endian PowerPC as well.
> The choice of register accessor functions must purely depend
> on the CPU architecture, not which endianess the CPU is running
> on. Note that we nowadays allow both big-endian ARM and little-endian
> PowerPC kernels.
> With this patch applied, we will do the right thing in all four
> combinations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Thanks Arnd, I've squashed in the revert of Guenter's patch.
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (243 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists