netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: introduce SO_BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1389899388.31367.414.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:09:48 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc:	Michal Sekletar <msekleta@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: introduce SO_BPF_EXTENSIONS

On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 19:52 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 01/16/2014 07:49 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 19:34 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >
> >>> Thank you for the review. Btw, what do you think about define for parisc? I am
> >>
> >> Yes, saw that in the patch and had similar thoughts.
> >>
> >>> not sure I grok 0x4048 for SO_MAX_PACING_RATE and hence not sure about 0x4029
> >>> for SO_BPF_EXTENSIONS.
> >>
> >> Hmm, maybe typo; SO_MAX_PACING_RATE should have been a 0x4028 ?
> >
> > Indeed it was a typo.
> >
> > I think its time to change this, as this was added for linux-3.13
> 
> Ok, are you sending out a patch?

Yes, I will, thanks !


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html