netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/6] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140116.152800.901405996505782677.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 16 Jan 2014 15:28:00 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mwdalton@...gle.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/6] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc
 in skb_page_frag_refill

All 6 patches applied.

Next time, PLEASE, give me a header email ala "[PATCH net-next v4 0/6]" giving
a broad overview of the series.

This serves several purposes.

First, it gives me a single top-level email to reply to when I want to let
you know that I've either applied or rejected this series.  Because you
didn't provide a header posting, I have to pick an arbitrary one of
the patches to use for this purpose as I have done here.

Second, it gives a place for you to describe at a high level what the patch
series is doing.  I create dummy merge commits and place that descriptive
text into it, so that anyone else looking at the GIT history can see that
these patches go together as a coherent unit and what that unit is trying
to achieve.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html