netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] virtio-net: drop rq->max and rq->num

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52D75F13.2060504@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:24:51 +0800
From:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, mst@...hat.com,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] virtio-net: drop rq->max and rq->num

On 01/16/2014 08:46 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Rusty Russell<rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:25:26 +1030
>
>> Rusty Russell<rusty@...tcorp.com.au>  writes:
>>> Jason Wang<jasowang@...hat.com>  writes:
>>>> It looks like there's no need for those two fields:
>>>>
>>>> - Unless there's a failure for the first refill try, rq->max should be always
>>>>    equal to the vring size.
>>>> - rq->num is only used to determine the condition that we need to do the refill,
>>>>    we could check vq->num_free instead.
>>>> - rq->num was required to be increased or decreased explicitly after each
>>>>    get/put which results a bad API.
>>>>
>>>> So this patch removes them both to make the code simpler.
>>> Nice.  These fields date from when the vq struct was opaque.
>>>
>>> Applied,
>>> Rusty.
>> Oops, this doesn't require any core virtio changes, so it's for DaveM:
>>
>> Acked-by: Rusty Russell<rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> Jason please repost this with Rusty's ACK, thanks.

Sure, will repost.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html