lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:53:45 +0100
From:	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: trivial: rename slave->jiffies to
 ->last_link_up

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 03:20:37AM +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
>slave->jiffies is updated every time the slave becomes active, which, for
>bonding, means that its link is 'up'.
>
>CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
>CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
>Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>

Self-NAK, as the first patchset was dropped and will be sent as v2, I'll
just slip this patch in there.

Sorry for the noise.

>---
>
>Notes:
>    On top of
>
>    [PATCH net-next 0/6] bonding: only rely on arp packets if arp monitor is used
>
>    Sorry for the trivial patch, but I'm always loosing some time
>    trying to remember what that actually means.
>
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h   |  3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>index f9e5512..0f613ae 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ void bond_change_active_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_active)
> 		return;
>
> 	if (new_active) {
>-		new_active->jiffies = jiffies;
>+		new_active->last_link_up = jiffies;
>
> 		if (new_active->link == BOND_LINK_BACK) {
> 			if (USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode)) {
>@@ -1488,7 +1488,7 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
> 	}
>
> 	if (new_slave->link != BOND_LINK_DOWN)
>-		new_slave->jiffies = jiffies;
>+		new_slave->last_link_up = jiffies;
> 	pr_debug("Initial state of slave_dev is BOND_LINK_%s\n",
> 		new_slave->link == BOND_LINK_DOWN ? "DOWN" :
> 			(new_slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP ? "UP" : "BACK"));
>@@ -1923,7 +1923,7 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
> 				 * recovered before downdelay expired
> 				 */
> 				slave->link = BOND_LINK_UP;
>-				slave->jiffies = jiffies;
>+				slave->last_link_up = jiffies;
> 				pr_info("%s: link status up again after %d ms for interface %s.\n",
> 					bond->dev->name,
> 					(bond->params.downdelay - slave->delay) *
>@@ -1998,7 +1998,7 @@ static void bond_miimon_commit(struct bonding *bond)
>
> 		case BOND_LINK_UP:
> 			slave->link = BOND_LINK_UP;
>-			slave->jiffies = jiffies;
>+			slave->last_link_up = jiffies;
>
> 			if (bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_8023AD) {
> 				/* prevent it from being the active one */
>@@ -2345,7 +2345,7 @@ int bond_arp_rcv(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond,
> 		bond_validate_arp(bond, slave, sip, tip);
> 	else if (bond->curr_active_slave &&
> 		 time_after(slave_last_arp_rx(bond, bond->curr_active_slave),
>-			    bond->curr_active_slave->jiffies))
>+			    bond->curr_active_slave->last_link_up))
> 		bond_validate_arp(bond, slave, tip, sip);
>
> out_unlock:
>@@ -2392,9 +2392,9 @@ static void bond_loadbalance_arp_mon(struct work_struct *work)
> 	oldcurrent = ACCESS_ONCE(bond->curr_active_slave);
> 	/* see if any of the previous devices are up now (i.e. they have
> 	 * xmt and rcv traffic). the curr_active_slave does not come into
>-	 * the picture unless it is null. also, slave->jiffies is not needed
>-	 * here because we send an arp on each slave and give a slave as
>-	 * long as it needs to get the tx/rx within the delta.
>+	 * the picture unless it is null. also, slave->last_link_up is not
>+	 * needed here because we send an arp on each slave and give a slave
>+	 * as long as it needs to get the tx/rx within the delta.
> 	 * TODO: what about up/down delay in arp mode? it wasn't here before
> 	 *       so it can wait
> 	 */
>@@ -2516,7 +2516,7 @@ static int bond_ab_arp_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
> 		 * active.  This avoids bouncing, as the last receive
> 		 * times need a full ARP monitor cycle to be updated.
> 		 */
>-		if (bond_time_in_interval(bond, slave->jiffies, 2))
>+		if (bond_time_in_interval(bond, slave->last_link_up, 2))
> 			continue;
>
> 		/*
>@@ -2709,7 +2709,7 @@ static void bond_ab_arp_probe(struct bonding *bond)
> 	new_slave->link = BOND_LINK_BACK;
> 	bond_set_slave_active_flags(new_slave);
> 	bond_arp_send_all(bond, new_slave);
>-	new_slave->jiffies = jiffies;
>+	new_slave->last_link_up = jiffies;
> 	rcu_assign_pointer(bond->current_arp_slave, new_slave);
> }
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>index 99126b2..9f07af1 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>@@ -184,7 +184,8 @@ struct slave {
> 	struct net_device *dev; /* first - useful for panic debug */
> 	struct bonding *bond; /* our master */
> 	int    delay;
>-	unsigned long jiffies;
>+	/* all three in jiffies */
>+	unsigned long last_link_up;
> 	unsigned long last_arp_rx;
> 	unsigned long target_last_arp_rx[BOND_MAX_ARP_TARGETS];
> 	s8     link;    /* one of BOND_LINK_XXXX */
>-- 
>1.8.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists