netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] net: rfkill: gpio: Add device tree support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1389990392.10404.10.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
Date:	Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:26:32 +0100
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] net: rfkill: gpio: Add device tree support

On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 14:47 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:

> This patch series adds device tree support to rfkill-gpio, and
> fixes some issues I ran into. This is so we can define and control
> RF devices through the device tree, such as the Broadcom BCM20710
> UART-based Bluetooth device found on the CubieTruck,

> Comments, please?

Does anyone else want to maintain rfkill-gpio? :)

I'm not up to par on all the DT, ACPI and even GPIO stuff it does, and
the rfkill bits in it are really small ...

I'll happily apply the patches if everyone else is happy with them, but
please don't expect me to actually be able to say anything about them.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html