netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: vxlan: do not use vxlan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1390096868.31367.546.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Sat, 18 Jan 2014 18:01:08 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: vxlan: do not use vxlan_net before
 checking event type

On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 15:38 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> Cc'ing netdev back...
> 
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> > Daniel did the right thing and David agreed.
> >
> > And I agreed.
> 
> If you mean the code, I don't even want to argue from the beginning.
> 
> If you mean the author of the patch, it is obviously wrong.
> 
> >
> > So if you want to fight, feel free, but its going to be really hard.
> >
> 
> I see.
> 
> Next time, I will pick up your patch, change a very minor issue,
> and *steal* it as mine (a.k.a ignoring From:). So that in the changelog
> your patch will become mine.
> 
> You don't mind, since you already agreed above...

You failed to the test I did with you.

By adding netdev back to a mail I sent privately, you violated one very
elementary rule of communication.

This is a huge mistake.

I will never send you again a private mail.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html