[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140121220016.GF3015@minipsycho.orion>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 23:00:16 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Shrijeet Mukherjee <shm@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] bonding: add netlink attributes to slave
link dev
Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:36:58PM CET, sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com wrote:
>
>On Jan 21, 2014, at 5:34 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>
>>> + if (rtnl_bond_slave_fill(skb, dev))
>>> + goto nla_put_failure;
>>> +
>>
>> I must say I do not like this at all. This should be done in a generic
>> way. By a callback registered by bonding and possibly other master-slave
>> device types.
>
>The bond was registered with the ndo_get_slave op. ndo_get_slave could be used for other master-slave device types. I’ll agree that rtnl_bond_slave_fill() could have been written more generically. Is that the objection?
I think is should be done rather in rtnl_link_ops. It's the natural point
for this ops. I have patchset prepared. Will send it very soon.
>
>> I have something in mind, will try to prepare patch soon.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists