[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8761pb7jzq.fsf@natisbad.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 23:02:49 +0100
From: arno@...isbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard)
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] null pointer dereference in tcp_gso_segment()
Hi Eric,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> writes:
>> Unless there is an assumption I missed somewhere in the function, the
>> problem may occur during the first round of the loop, because (unlike
>> the 'while' condition does at line 21) skb->next is not checked against
>> null at lines 17 above before it is passed to tcp_hdr() at line 18.
>>
>> To be honest, I am asking because I am not familiar w/ the code and it
>> is somewhat old so I wonder why noone got hit before. AFAICT,
>> f4c50d990dcf ([NET]: Add software TSOv4) added TSOv4 support in 2006 via
>> introduction of tcp_tso_segmen() (with the same kind of deref but
>> possibly different assumptions) which was more recently modified via
>> 28850dc7c7 (net: tcp: move GRO/GSO functions to tcp_offload) to become
>> tcp_gso_segment().
>>
>> David, can you confirm the analysis and possibly comment on the
>> conditions needed for the bug to manifest?
>
> A gso packet contains at least 2 segments.
By whom / where is it enforced?
Cheers,
a+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists