netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] xen-netback: TX grant mapping with SKBTX_DEV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:39:48 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	zoltan.kiss@...rix.com
Cc:	ian.campbell@...rix.com, wei.liu2@...rix.com,
	xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jonathan.davies@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] xen-netback: TX grant mapping with
 SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY instead of copy

From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:13:07 +0000

> It is already based on two predecessor patches, one which is already
> accepted but not applied yet:
> 
> [PATCH net-next v2] xen-netback: Rework rx_work_todo
> 
> And the other one is hopefully will be accepted very soon:
> 
> [PATCH v5] xen/grant-table: Avoid m2p_override during mapping

These have both been asked for changes or small adjustments to be made.

Also, you really have to precisely and explicitly mention any
dependencies which exist.

In fact, it's often best to not post a series until the dependent
patches have been accepted.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html