netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/4] ipv4: don't disable interface if last ipv4 address is removed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140122.175234.1504624022995273271.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:52:34 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	popovich_sergei@...l.ru
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ipv4: don't disable interface if last ipv4 address
 is removed

From: Sergey Popovich <popovich_sergei@...l.ru>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 13:48:48 +0200

> Since
> 
>   commit 876fd05ddbae03166e7037fca957b55bb3be6594
>   Author: Hannes Frederic Sowa <>
>   Date:   Mon Jun 24 00:22:20 2013 +0200
> 
>     ipv6: don't disable interface if last ipv6 address is removed
> 
> we have disabled this behavior for IPv6. Adjust behavior for IPv4.

I do not agree with this change.

IPV4 is a lot different from ipv6, for example ipv4 lacks things like
temporary address assignments and other notifications that links listen
to even if they don't have explicit static addressed assigned.

The ipv4 behavior also has two decades of precedence, and I think you'll
have a very hard time convincing me that nobody depends upon it.

So I'm not applying this patch, sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html