[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140123030329.GI7269@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 04:03:29 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: ja@....bg, gregory.hoggarth@...iedtelesis.co.nz,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux kernel patch: elide fib_validate_source() completely when possible - bad side effect?
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 06:53:05PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 03:02:24 +0100
>
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:04:52PM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> >> I don't remember someone mentioning about such
> >> side-effect, I guess it is overlooked. IMHO, it is not a good
> >> reason to restore the old behavior. Lets see other opinions.
> >
> > A routing lookup to check for broadcast is much too expansive, I agree. But
> > can't we just check skb->pkt_type == PACKET_BROADCAST?
>
> We can't universally know what a broadcast is, because the prefix of
> every network is a local piece of information.
>
> We might not have the route necessary to know the source address is
> a broadcast if the packet came through more than 1 hop already.
But in this case we only need those local pieces.
E.g. we register all local registered broadcast addresses in a structure
like inet_addr_lst so we only need to check if the packet would leave
this host with a broadcast hardware address. If the packet is forwarded
the router must do the same check as only it knows the local broadcast
addresses. I hope this is correct. ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists