[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140123142058.GK7269@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:20:58 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
gregory.hoggarth@...iedtelesis.co.nz, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux kernel patch: elide fib_validate_source() completely when possible - bad side effect?
Hi Julian,
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:47:33AM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>
> > E.g. we register all local registered broadcast addresses in a structure
> > like inet_addr_lst so we only need to check if the packet would leave
> > this host with a broadcast hardware address. If the packet is forwarded
> > the router must do the same check as only it knows the local broadcast
> > addresses. I hope this is correct. ;)
>
> Now when we can override the local table with ip
> rules or to prepend route in local table, we can not be
> sure that the broadcast routes are returned in all cases,
> users can add unicast routes for such addresses.
>
> I don't remember for useful case where one may need to
> override broadcast routes but adding such exceptions looks
> risky.
The check I envisioned would only actually block the ifa_broadcast of only the
incoming interface as source address. So we wouldn't depend on the view of the
routing tables at all.
But I have no strong opinion on that.
Greetings,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists