[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E12DDE.5090203@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:57:34 -0500
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
To: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bridge: Fix crash with vlan filtering and tcpdump
On 01/23/2014 07:38 AM, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 13:24 -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>> When the vlan filtering is enabled on the bridge, but
>> the filter is not configured on the bridge device itself,
>> running tcpdump on the bridge device will result in a
>> an Oops with NULL pointer dereference. The reason
>> is that br_pass_frame_up() will bypass the vlan
>> check because promisc flag is set. It will then try
>> to get the table pointer and process the packet based
>> on the table. Since the table pointer is NULL, we oops.
>> Catch this special condition in br_handle_vlan().
>>
>> Reported-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
>> CC: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
>> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Do not use a BUG or BUG_ON as it is possible to trigger the
>> false BUG condition when thrashing the vlan_enable toggle.
>> Instead just drop the skb.
>
> Maybe that frame went through should_deliver() while vlan_filtering was
> disabled?
yes. That's what happend.
> I hope it doesn't affect other codes in an adverse way...
I didn't see any adverse conditions while running the while(1) loop
changing vlan_flitering, but I didn't run it for all that long (about a
minute).
I am working on a series to reduce the possible races that involves
marking the skb (in the cb) and using that marking in later invocations.
>
>>
>> net/bridge/br_input.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> net/bridge/br_vlan.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
> ...
>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
>> index af5ebd1..abc841c 100644
>> --- a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
>> @@ -144,6 +144,20 @@ struct sk_buff *br_handle_vlan(struct net_bridge *br,
>> if (!br->vlan_enabled)
>> goto out;
>>
>> + /* Vlan filter table must be configured at this point. The
>> + * only exception is the bridge is set in promisc mode and the
>> + * packet is destined for the bridge device. In this case
>> + * pass the packet as is.
>> + */
>> + if (!pv) {
>> + if ((br->dev->flags & IFF_PROMISC) && skb->dev == br->dev)
>> + goto out;
>> + else {
>> + kfree_skb_list(skb);
>
> Why is this not kfree_skb() but kfree_skb_list()?
> I haven't seen kfree_skb_list() in the bridge code.
I thought it is possible to get a list here, but upon further inspection
I don't see that happening. I'll change that to kfree_skb().
Thanks
-vlad
>
> Thanks,
> Toshiaki Makita
>
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> /* At this point, we know that the frame was filtered and contains
>> * a valid vlan id. If the vlan id is set in the untagged bitmap,
>> * send untagged; otherwise, send taged.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists