netdev - Re: critic on documentation of the network stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140124155835.467deca8@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date:	Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:58:35 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: critic on documentation of the network stack

On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 04:23:24 +0100
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org> wrote:

> Hello!
> 
> After net-next is closed I wanted to put the following link here:
> 
>   <http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4356053&cid=45184693>

The problem I have is more that there are more incorrect sources of documentation
and differing opinions on the Internet. Maybe the problem is users, maybe the
problem is lack of SEO, or developers not being paid to write documentation, or
old web sites not being updated. For example, this commenter obviously never
found http://www.lartc.org/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html